Laura Mulvey
Thinking through Film

AMY! + Frida Kahlo & Tina Modotti

UK 1980/1983, 34/29 mins
Directors: Laura Mulvey, Peter Wollen


We are delighted to announce that Griselda Pollock (Professor Emerita of Social and Critical Histories of Art, University of Leeds) will be joining Laura Mulvey for the post-screening discussion hosted by Mandy Merck (Professor Emerita of Media Arts at Royal Holloway, University of London).

Laura Mulvey: AMY! and Frida Kahlo & Tina Modotti, our two short films, were based on the real lives and achievements of extraordinary women. Although Frida Kahlo & Tina Modotti originated as a film record of the exhibition Peter and I curated in 1982 at the Whitechapel Gallery, it evolved into a much more complex, and cinematically considered, project. Obviously, the exhibition had consisted of Kahlo’s paintings and Modotti’s photographs on the gallery walls; the accompanying catalogue essay reflected our interest in the two women’s lives and their politics, their attitudes to the female body and the significant, but very different, questions they raise about women’s art and aesthetics. On the screen, the images, stories and ideas could come together, fusing into a series of visual juxtapositions.

Although I would say that our previous films had all been constructed around systems of montage (primarily due to the place of pattern and tableaux in their structure), juxtaposition, in both form and content, was crucial for Frida Kahlo & Tina Modotti. The film’s shape and argument had a rigorous binary structure, that became dialectical through montage. The Kahlo paintings and Modotti photographs were grouped thematically into three chapters; the first contrasted Kahlo’s persistent return to painting herself with Modotti’s engagement with public spaces, the second contrasted Kahlo’s roots in her house and in Mexican culture with Modotti’s internationalism and the third contrasted their personal, different, relation to the female body and its effect on their art. The combining of ideas, the use of montage, that is, was intended to generate a wider conceptual framework, a reflection on how very varied experiences could still inform a feminist political consciousness. Julian Rothenstein designed an initial ‘starting point’ for each chapter in which ‘Frida Kahlo’ and ‘Tina Modotti’ are juxtaposed in word and image. The montage opens up a space for a ‘third meaning’, a resonant evocation, through Kahlo and Modotti individually, of women’s lives, their struggles and the particularity of their art more generally. Given that the documentary was intended for educational screenings, we ultimately added a voice-over text, taken from the exhibition catalogue, to make the implications of the montage clearer.

We first came across Amy Johnson in 1980, when the fiftieth anniversary of her flight to Australia in 1930 was the occasion for newspaper stories and celebrations of her life. Her story raised the question, difficult for feminism, of a woman’s attempt to move into a male role and the associated, but intractable, concept of the ‘heroine’. From an Amy Johnson biography we discovered that our original theme of a woman’s heroism was complicated by her celebrity. While the public gaze and patriarchal recuperation surrounding her return interested us psychoanalytically, her flight also attracted a certain imperial triumphalism as it was interpolated and ‘transcribed’, as Peter put it, ‘into the language of the Empire in legend.’ Coincidentally, the date further drew us to the Amy story; we had already been thinking about the political significance of the year 1930, the onset of the Great Depression, for 1980 in the immediate aftermath of the 1979 election.

From the wider events of Amy Johnson’s life, we extracted two pivot points to dramatise the significance of gender and the public gaze for her story. The first: her transition from ‘ordinary girl’ to aspiring aviatrix; the second: from triumphant heroine to abject celebrity. The first transition takes place through the mise-en-scène. Amy as ‘ordinary girl’ is evoked through soft lighting, colour and the kind of objects she has close to her as she moves together with the camera from her dressing table to the fireplace. As ‘aspiring aviatrix’ she is shot in day light, wearing trousers, and her dressing table has become a desk where she studies engineering and, accordingly, in her reverse movement from the fireplace, the collection of objects has also changed. There is a very reduced, but still pertinent, homage to Hollywood melodrama’s use of mise-en-scène, lighting, colour, objects and camera movement in this scene. The second transition is staged through the apparatus. As ‘triumphant heroine’, Amy is filmed with an extremely long lens. At first, she retreats from the camera’s pursuing and phallic gaze but then turns to face the lens with a complicit, feminine passivity. In the fourth scene, she is filmed, in close-up, through a two-way mirror; she puts on layers of make-up, excessively and ironically, and then draws her image onto the mirror as though onto the camera’s lens. There is a sense of flatness as though the active presence of the camera had morphed into the passivity of the screen. My theoretical interest in the Hollywood melodrama and my critique of woman as spectacle in ‘Visual Pleasure’ both inform, if only residually, the representation of Amy.

We had originally planned to make our Amy Johnson film as a feature but failed to get the requisite BFI funding. We immediately reconfigured the project, paring the story down to essentials and entwining the performed tableaux with certain still-extant sites that Amy had, as it were, inhabited in her lifetime: the department store Peter Jones, Croydon Airport, the Daily Mail building and her little Tiger Moth hanging in the Science Museum. For Peter and me, these were indexical traces of a once-upon-a-time reality, a tribute to both the complexity of time and the cinema’s complex recording of it. The Poly Styrene and X-Ray Spex songs further complicate temporality; evocative of punk from the late 1970s, they would in time acquire a historical patina not unlike that of ‘Amy, Wonderful Amy’. In the case of the map, certain places have acquired emblematic and tragic significance due to wars that have spread across the intervening decades: for instance, Banja Luka (Bosnia), Fallujah (Iraq) and Raqqa (Syria).
Laura Mulvey, Introduction from Oliver Fuke (ed), The Films of Laura Mulvey and Peter Wollen: Scripts, Working Documents, Interpretation (BFI/Bloomsbury, 2023)

AMY!
Directors: Laura Mulvey, Peter Wollen
Production Company: Modelmark
Made with financial assistance from: Southern Arts
Producer: Laura Mulvey
Screenplay: Laura Mulvey, Peter Wollen
Camera: Diane Tammes
2nd Camera: Francine Winham
[Camera] Crew: Jonathan Collinson, Anne Cottringer
Video: Evanston Percussion Unit, Fantasy Factory
Editor: Larry Sider
Designer: Michael Hurd
Sound: Larry Sider
Thanks to: Chris Berg, Ian Christie, Rosalind Delmar, Keith Griffiths, Ilona Halberstadt, John Howe, Tina Keane, Tamara Krikorian, Carol Laws, Patsy Nightingale, Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, Carl Teitelbaum, Chad Wollen
Special thanks to: Feminist Improvising Group,
X-ray Spex, Jack Hylton and His Orchestra

With
Mary Maddox (Amy / words from Amy’s letters)
Class at Paddington College (Community Care Course)
Yvonne Rainer (voices of Bryher/Amelia Earhart/ Lola Montez, S./Gertrude Stein)
Jonathan Eden (headlines from the Times, May 1930)
Laura Mulvey
Peter Wollen

UK 1980
34 mins
Digital

Frida Kahlo & Tina Modotti
Directors: Laura Mulvey, Peter Wollen
Production Company: Modelmark
Sponsor: Arts Council of Great Britain
Executive Producer: Rodney Wilson
Production Manager: Patsy Nightingale
Script: Laura Mulvey, Peter Wollen
Rostrum Camera: Frameline, Peerless Camera Company
Stills Photography: Aurora Mosso M, Prudence Cuming, Jacques Rutten, Red Door Studios
Editors: Larry Sider, Nina Danino
Designer: Julian Rothenstein
Super-8 film: Beatriz Mira
Sound: Colin Martin
Narrator: Miriam Margolyes

UK 1983
29 mins
Digital


SIGHT AND SOUND
Never miss an issue with Sight and Sound, the BFI’s internationally renowned film magazine. Subscribe from just £25*
*Price based on a 6-month print subscription (UK only). More info: sightandsoundsubs.bfi.org.uk









BFI SOUTHBANK
Welcome to the home of great film and TV, with three cinemas and a studio, a world-class library, regular exhibitions and a pioneering Mediatheque with 1000s of free titles for you to explore. Browse special-edition merchandise in the BFI Shop.We're also pleased to offer you a unique new space, the BFI Riverfront – with unrivalled riverside views of Waterloo Bridge and beyond, a delicious seasonal menu, plus a stylish balcony bar for cocktails or special events. Come and enjoy a pre-cinema dinner or a drink on the balcony as the sun goes down.

BECOME A BFI MEMBER
Enjoy a great package of film benefits including priority booking at BFI Southbank and BFI Festivals. Join today at bfi.org.uk/join

BFI PLAYER
We are always open online on BFI Player where you can watch the best new, cult & classic cinema on demand. Showcasing hand-picked landmark British and independent titles, films are available to watch in three distinct ways: Subscription, Rentals & Free to view.

See something different today on player.bfi.org.uk

Join the BFI mailing list for regular programme updates. Not yet registered? Create a new account at www.bfi.org.uk/signup

Programme notes and credits compiled by Sight and Sound and the BFI Documentation Unit
Notes may be edited or abridged
Questions/comments? Contact the Programme Notes team by email