Moviedrome
Bringing the Cult TV Series to the Big Screen

Performance

USA-UK 1970, 105 mins
Directors: Donald Cammell, Nicolas Roeg


‘What is a cult film? A cult film is one which has a passionate following but does not appeal to everybody. Just because a movie is a cult movie does not automatically guarantee quality. Some cult films are very bad. Others are very, very good. Some make an awful lot of money at the box office. Others make no money at all. Some are considered quality films. Others are exploitation.’ From 1988 to 2000 Moviedrome was presented by Alex Cox and then Mark Cousins. Across that time, more than 200 features were shown, and generations of movie fans and filmmakers would be informed and inspired by the selection, alongside the wit and wisdom of the introductions that preceded each screening. Moviedrome was a portal into the world of weird and wonderful cinema. This two-month season features some of the most notable titles screened and wherever possible they are preceded by the original televised introduction.
Nick Freand Jones, season curator and producer of Moviedrome

Alex Cox: Performance was made in Britain in 1968, immediately shelved by the studio that paid for it, then re-edited by seven different editors and released in 1970. It was co-directed by Donald Cammell and Nicolas Roeg. Cammell also wrote the script; Roeg photographed it. Some say this film is the product of Roeg’s genius, others that it’s all down to Donald Cammell – as if it was some sort of contest rather than a collaboration. For the record, Donald Cammell has also directed the computer slasher movie Demon Seed and the cult slasher White of the Eye. Roeg has made too many great films to mention.

It is, or appears to be, the story of a weird battle of wills between a London gangster and the inhabitants of a hippie pad on Powys Square in Notting Hill. There is so much to Performance – what it has to say about sex, violence, reality, illusion, counterculture and the culture of money, life, death, Brian Jones – that I have decided to eschew these weighty issues and concentrate instead on drugs and the nature of cool.

Performance was made at a time when drugs in our society were viewed neither as an escape or a night off, nor as the demons unscrupulous cops and politicians have made them out to be. Certainly, drugs in excess are bad for you, and that includes coffee and tobacco and alcohol and contraceptive pills. Even so, far fewer people die from drugs than die from guns and bombs. And back in 1968, drugs, specifically mushrooms, mescaline, peyote and chemical analogues like acid, were being used as a shortcut to the Mystical Experience, a sort of short-circuit satori. Anything that makes you doubt the ethics of a materialistic doomed culture isn’t all bad. Anything that makes you able to see your demons, as Turner does in Performance, is pretty interesting. Turner’s got it all figured out: he knows the ultimate drug of all is power, and power grows out of the barrel of a gun.

The other pressing question we must deal with here, although doubtless not resolve, is Who is Cooler? Turner the former rock star, played by Mick Jagger, or Chas the murderous gangster, portrayed by James Fox. When the film was made, in the late sixties, it was obvious. Chas was a vulgar wideboy, who dressed like a straight and poured red paint on his head in a ludicrous effort at disguise. Turner, on the other hand, had long flowing hair, and two girlfriends, and had once been a major pop singer, and was played by Mick Jagger. In 1970, Turner was king, although things did get a little strange when Jagger launched into ‘Memo from Turner’ (the first rock video?) with his hair slicked back and a drape jacket like a Teddy Boy. By 1980, the opposite was true. Turner seemed like a strange artefact, a rather uncool and dilapidated relic of the sixties… Chas, on the other hand, with appalling taste in suits and his bright red spiky-top, was up to the minute, the first punk movie hero since Gaston Modot.

Ten, twelve years later, ponytails are being worn again in fashionable bistros all across the land. The sixties are now in vogue again, Turner triumphant. Chas laid low. Poor Chas. He doesn’t even have a mobile phone.
Alex Cox’s original introduction for Moviedrome. Also published in Moviedrome: The Guide 2 (BBC, 1993). With thanks to moviedromer.tumblr.com

A contemporary review
Performance is the kind of brilliant, baffling film about which it would be marginally more easy to write a book than a review. At its core is the essentially mystical idea of the interchangeability of all identities, so that instead of a finite series of equations between Turner and Chas Devlin, one finds oneself inside some hermetic hall of mirrors, looking hopelessly for one definitive image that will prove more than a reflection of a reflection.

The idea of a vicious, male role-playing gangster and an androgynous fallen pop idol each recognising the other as his alter ego is already an audacious one, and it is developed rather subtly, with the characters’ similarities left unstated: the fact that each finds himself suddenly cast outside the chosen element where once he reigned supreme, ‘stuck’, as Pherber says of Turner, with no way but death of continuing in his once chosen role; the fact that both are ‘performers’, agents for gratifying other people’s desires, vicarious symbols of virility and power. Turner may, as Pherber states, have been waiting for Chas, but the audacious idea of them as complementary halves of the same being takes on labyrinthine ramifications when we notice that Turner is also Flowers (in Chas’ nightmare), is also Lucy (when she climbs into Chas’ bed), is also Chas himself (as he steps into the death car); or that, as Pherber tries to demonstrate to Chas when she uses a mirror to show him his face on her body, they are all both male and female.

As the film progresses, the idea unfolds that every identity is an assumed identity and that the trap is inescapable: most people act out their self-important roles unaware of the hidden system of correspondances whereby the lawyer is the criminal is the mystic; and those, like Turner, who do perceive the system are paralysed by their vision into waiting immobile for death to release them. The principal source for the film’s ideas (unobtrusively signalled through books and a poster that swims across our field of vision) is Borges, though Cammell also freely acknowledges the influences of Hesse, Norman O. Brown and Artaud. But what is admirable about Performance is not the fact that Donald Cammell should have written a script under the influence of such dauntingly heavyweight writers, but that he and his co-director Nicolas Roeg should have succeeded in creating a purely cinematic language for expressing their ideas. For Performance is not a mystical essay but a film, relying entirely on what it shows, what we see, to suggest the working of less visible forces. It has a witty script – terse, abrasive and devastatingly accurate for the scenes in the gangster milieu, more flowery and incoherent for the conversations inside Turner’s private Kathmandu.

The two worlds through which Chas moves are both convincingly created on the level of realism, yet with no obvious rules or rituals in common; and once Chas enters Turner’s hermetic world, the narrative abandons the gangsters’ activities until the final showdown, so that – like Chas himself – the audience, having grown familiar with one ‘language’, is forced to start again and learn to decipher the symbols of an entirely new one. But though visually dazzling, wittily and literately scripted, and brilliantly conceived, the film inevitably derives much of its strength from its performers, nearly all of whom achieve a near-symbiotic relationship with their roles.
Jan Dawson, Monthly Film Bulletin, February 1971

Performance
Directed by: Donald Cammell, Nicolas Roeg
©: Warner Bros, Inc.
A Goodtime Enterprises production
Made by: Goodtime Enterprises Limited
Distributed by: Warner Bros.
Produced by: Sanford Lieberson
Associate Producer: David Cammell
Production Manager: Robert Lynn
Unit Manager: Kevin Kavanagh
Production Runner: Christopher O’Dell *
Assistant Director: Richard Burge
Continuity: Anabelle Davis-Goff
Written by: Donald Cammell
Photographed by: Nicolas Roeg
Camera Operator: Mike Molloy
Film Editors: Antony Gibbs, Brian Smedley-Aston
Art Director: John Clark
Set Dresser: Peter Young
Turner’s House Design Consultant: Christopher Gibbs
Costume Consultant: Deborah Dixon
Wardrobe: Emma Porteous, Billy Jay
Mr James Fox’s Suits by: Hymie of Waterloo, London
Make-up: Paul Rabiger, Linda De Vetta
Hairdresser: Helen Lennox
Colour by: Technicolor
Music by: Jack Nitzsche
Played by: Ry Cooder, Bobby West, Russel Titelman, The Merry Clayton Singers, Milt Holland, Amiya Dasgupta, Lowell George, Gene Parsons
Moog Synthesizer: Bernard Krause
Santur: Nasser Rastigar-Nejad
Music Conducted by: Randy Newman
Sound Recordist: Ron Barron
Sound Editor: Alan Pattillo
Buffy Ste.Marie performed musically through the courtesy of: Vanguard Records
Dialogue Consultant and Technical Adviser: David Litvinoff
Completed at: Twickenham Film Studios

Cast
James Fox (Chas Devlin)
Mick Jagger (Turner)
Anita Pallenberg (Pherber)
Michele Breton (Lucy)
Ann Sidney (Dana)
John Bindon (Moody)
Stanley Meadows (Rosebloom)
Allan Cuthbertson (the lawyer)
Antony Morton (Dennis)
Johnny Shannon (Harry Flowers)
Anthony Valentine (Joey Maddocks)
Ken Colley (Tony Farrell)
John Sterland (the chauffeur)
Laraine Wickens (Lorraine)

USA-UK 1970©
105 mins
35mm

*Uncredited

A BFI National Archive print

Moviedrome transmission date: 7 July 1991


With thanks to
Sue Deeks, Simon Chilcott, Carl Davies, Josephine Haining and Andrew Abbott


SIGHT AND SOUND
Never miss an issue with Sight and Sound, the BFI’s internationally renowned film magazine. Subscribe from just £25*
*Price based on a 6-month print subscription (UK only). More info: sightandsoundsubs.bfi.org.uk









BFI SOUTHBANK
Welcome to the home of great film and TV, with three cinemas and a studio, a world-class library, regular exhibitions and a pioneering Mediatheque with 1000s of free titles for you to explore. Browse special-edition merchandise in the BFI Shop.We're also pleased to offer you a unique new space, the BFI Riverfront – with unrivalled riverside views of Waterloo Bridge and beyond, a delicious seasonal menu, plus a stylish balcony bar for cocktails or special events. Come and enjoy a pre-cinema dinner or a drink on the balcony as the sun goes down.

BECOME A BFI MEMBER
Enjoy a great package of film benefits including priority booking at BFI Southbank and BFI Festivals. Join today at bfi.org.uk/join

BFI PLAYER
We are always open online on BFI Player where you can watch the best new, cult & classic cinema on demand. Showcasing hand-picked landmark British and independent titles, films are available to watch in three distinct ways: Subscription, Rentals & Free to view.

See something different today on player.bfi.org.uk

Join the BFI mailing list for regular programme updates. Not yet registered? Create a new account at www.bfi.org.uk/signup

Programme notes and credits compiled by Sight and Sound and the BFI Documentation Unit
Notes may be edited or abridged
Questions/comments? Contact the Programme Notes team by email